Transfer beyond the room
Does closeness built in a circle carry into people’s existing relationships?
The one pre–post study found more closeness toward fellow participants, but no measurable change in relationships outside the course.
- Disciplines
- Social psychology, Relationship science
- Methods
- Longitudinal study, Partner reports, Experience sampling
- Status
- Open
Why it matters
Practitioners often describe Circling as training for everyday relating. If its effects stay inside the room, it is a good evening; if they transfer, it is an intervention.
What exists
Gärdenfors & Jönsson (2022) found that closeness and responsiveness rose toward fellow participants after an Authentic Relating weekend, but relationships outside the course showed no significant change. The sample was small and the follow-up short.
Outside relational practice, two qualitative studies follow meditation into working life. Lychnell (2017) describes how seven managers brought a meditative attitude to hard situations at work, and Lychnell (2020) found that support in the company, including a holding environment, helped managers carry a mindfulness programme into everyday work.
A possible design
Follow participants and one person close to each of them, such as a partner or friend, for several months. Combine experience sampling of everyday interactions with partner-reported responsiveness, and compare with a waitlist group.
Pitfalls
Self-reports of relating better are easy to inflate. Reports from the people around participants are harder to fake.
Builds on
- 2022
Kan relationer fördjupas genom bemötandeträning? En utvärdering av en helgkurs i autentiskt relaterande [Can relationships be deepened through responsiveness training? An evaluation of a weekend course in authentic relating]Gärdenfors & Jönsson · Degree thesis · Lund University
Cautions: Small sample · Self-selected participants · Self-report only
After a two-day Authentic Relating course, participants felt markedly closer to a fellow participant. Ratings of a close friend who hadn’t attended didn’t change two to four weeks later.
- 2024
Reducing Loneliness through the Power of Practicing Together: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Dyadic Socio-Emotional vs. Mindfulness-Based TrainingMatthaeus et al. · Journal article, peer-reviewed · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Cautions: Studied by its developers · Commercial interest · Same study as another entry · Self-report only · No later follow-up
Ten weeks of online partner practice (Affect Dyads) reduced loneliness compared with a waitlist. Against mindfulness training, the advantage showed only in momentary, everyday loneliness.
- 2017
When work becomes meditation: how managers use work as a tool for personal growthLychnell · Journal article, peer-reviewed · Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion
Cautions: Self-selected participants
Seven CEOs and business owners, followed for two years, brought a meditative attitude to hard situations at work. Their focus shifted from attending to suffering, to witnessing what is, to responding with authenticity.
- 2020
Mindfulness-based interventions in context: A case study of managers’ experiences and the role of the organizational environmentLychnell · Book chapter · The Routledge Companion to Mindfulness at Work (Routledge)
A longitudinal case study of a workplace mindfulness programme. Managers developed perspective-taking, empathy and authentic functioning, and features of the company helped them carry these into everyday work.
- 1998
Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges.Laurenceau et al. · Journal article, peer-reviewed · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cautions: Self-report only
Two diary studies linked disclosure and feeling that a partner responded with understanding to greater intimacy, with emotional disclosure more strongly linked than factual disclosure.
- 1972
The Impact of Encounter Groups on Participants: Some Preliminary FindingsLieberman et al. · Journal article, peer-reviewed · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Cautions: Same study as another entry · Self-selected participants
A preliminary evaluation of encounter groups reported both benefits and harms and examined how outcomes related to leaders’ behaviour.