A controlled trial of Circling
Does a Circling programme reduce loneliness or build closeness more than an active control?
No randomised trial of Circling or Authentic Relating exists. Trials of structured partner practices show the design is feasible and the outcomes measurable.
- Disciplines
- Social psychology, Clinical psychology
- Methods
- Randomised controlled trial, Pre-registration
- Status
- Open
Why it matters
The claim most often made for Circling, that it builds connection, has never been tested against a comparison group. The direct evidence is one ethnography and two student theses.
What exists
Matthaeus et al. (2024) randomised 253 adults to ten weeks of online partner practice, mindfulness training or a waitlist. Partner practice reduced loneliness against the waitlist, but beat mindfulness only on momentary loneliness. Kok & Singer (2017) found that closeness grew with partner exercises over a nine-month training. Gärdenfors & Jönsson (2022) measured a single Authentic Relating weekend before and after.
A possible design
Randomise adults to a multi-week Circling programme, an active control matched for time and group contact (such as structured small-group discussion), or a waitlist. Pre-register loneliness and closeness as primary outcomes, with a follow-up at three months.
Pitfalls
People who seek out relational practices expect to benefit, so an active control and measured expectations matter. Facilitator skill varies widely and should be recorded.