A controlled trial of Circling

Does a Circling programme reduce loneliness or build closeness more than an active control?

No randomised trial of Circling or Authentic Relating exists. Trials of structured partner practices show the design is feasible and the outcomes measurable.

Why it matters

The claim most often made for Circling, that it builds connection, has never been tested against a comparison group. The direct evidence is one ethnography and two student theses.

What exists

Matthaeus et al. (2024) randomised 253 adults to ten weeks of online partner practice, mindfulness training or a waitlist. Partner practice reduced loneliness against the waitlist, but beat mindfulness only on momentary loneliness. Kok & Singer (2017) found that closeness grew with partner exercises over a nine-month training. Gärdenfors & Jönsson (2022) measured a single Authentic Relating weekend before and after.

A possible design

Randomise adults to a multi-week Circling programme, an active control matched for time and group contact (such as structured small-group discussion), or a waitlist. Pre-register loneliness and closeness as primary outcomes, with a follow-up at three months.

Pitfalls

People who seek out relational practices expect to benefit, so an active control and measured expectations matter. Facilitator skill varies widely and should be recorded.

Builds on

  1. 2024
    Reducing Loneliness through the Power of Practicing Together: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Dyadic Socio-Emotional vs. Mindfulness-Based Training

    Matthaeus et al. · Journal article, peer-reviewed · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    Cautions: Studied by its developers · Commercial interest · Same study as another entry · Self-report only · No later follow-up

    Ten weeks of online partner practice (Affect Dyads) reduced loneliness compared with a waitlist. Against mindfulness training, the advantage showed only in momentary, everyday loneliness.

  2. 2017
    Effects of Contemplative Dyads on Engagement and Perceived Social Connectedness Over 9 Months of Mental Training: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Kok & Singer · Journal article, peer-reviewed · JAMA Psychiatry

    Cautions: Studied by its developers · No later follow-up

    In a nine-month contemplative training, structured partner exercises engaged people as well as solitary meditation did, and their sense of social closeness grew.

  3. 2022
    Kan relationer fördjupas genom bemötandeträning? En utvärdering av en helgkurs i autentiskt relaterande [Can relationships be deepened through responsiveness training? An evaluation of a weekend course in authentic relating]

    Gärdenfors & Jönsson · Degree thesis · Lund University

    Cautions: Small sample · Self-selected participants · Self-report only

    After a two-day Authentic Relating course, participants felt markedly closer to a fellow participant. Ratings of a close friend who hadn’t attended didn’t change two to four weeks later.

  4. 1997
    The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness: A Procedure and Some Preliminary Findings

    Aron et al. · Journal article, peer-reviewed · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    Cautions: Self-report only · No later follow-up

    Pairs of strangers who took turns asking progressively more personal questions felt closer afterwards than pairs who made small talk. This is the research behind the “36 questions”.

  5. 2019
    GROUPS 4 HEALTH reduces loneliness and social anxiety in adults with psychological distress: Findings from a randomized controlled trial.

    Haslam et al. · Journal article, peer-reviewed · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    Cautions: Studied by its developers · Self-report only

    A trial found that Groups 4 Health reduced reported loneliness and social anxiety more than usual care by the two-month follow-up.

Where to study it

Possible funding