Cautions: Self-report only · No later follow-up
Pairs of strangers who took turns asking progressively more personal questions felt closer afterwards than pairs who made small talk. This is the research behind the “36 questions”.
Which parts of the practice do the work: present-moment attention, disclosure, or hearing how you affect others?
Circling bundles elements that each have their own research literature. Taking them apart would connect the practice to established mechanisms.
Builds on ten works
Circling combines present-moment attention, self-disclosure and moment-to-moment feedback about how people affect one another. Structured self-disclosure (Aron et al., 1997) and partner contemplation (Kok & Singer, 2017; Matthaeus et al., 2024) already have experimental support, and Ludwig et al. (2025) shows how to test one ingredient against a stripped-down version of the same exercise. Knowing which element matters tells facilitators what to protect, and researchers which theories apply.
A factorial lab study of short structured sessions that switch elements on or off: present-moment reporting against narrative storytelling, with and without reflections of impact. Outcomes: closeness, measured with the Inclusion of Other in the Self scale, and feeling understood.
A stripped-down lab version may lose what makes the practice what it is. Pair the experiment with practitioners who can say whether each condition still feels like Circling.
Cautions: Self-report only · No later follow-up
Pairs of strangers who took turns asking progressively more personal questions felt closer afterwards than pairs who made small talk. This is the research behind the “36 questions”.
Cautions: Studied by its developers · No later follow-up
In a nine-month contemplative training, structured partner exercises engaged people as well as solitary meditation did, and their sense of social closeness grew.
Cautions: Studied by its developers · Commercial interest · Same study as another entry · Self-report only · No later follow-up
Ten weeks of online partner practice (Affect Dyads) reduced loneliness compared with a waitlist. Against mindfulness training, the advantage showed only in momentary, everyday loneliness.
Cautions: No later follow-up
Two minutes of a partner meditation, gazing at each other while contemplating shared humanity, raised closeness by about one standard deviation, and partners’ smiles and heart rates fell into sync.
For noticing how a group creates meaning and gets stuck: suspending assumptions so they can be examined rather than defended or suppressed.
For contact with your own experience: the “felt sense”, an unclear bodily sense of a whole situation from which more precise meaning can emerge.
Cautions: Self-report only · No later follow-up
Five experiments found that attentive, understanding listening reduced immediate loneliness when people discussed or imagined discussing a past rejection.
Cautions: Self-report only
Three field experiments found small, persistent reductions in exclusionary attitudes after conversations that included a non-judgemental exchange of personal stories.
Cautions: Small sample · No later follow-up
Two experiments with women who had just met found that suppressing emotional expression disrupted the conversation, reduced rapport and raised the partners’ blood pressure.
Cautions: Small sample · Self-report only
An experiment found that supportive listening increased immediate closeness, while helping speakers rethink an upsetting film reduced their reaction to it two days later.