Side by side

Lineage · Anatomy · Among the therapies · Side by side

How Circling compares with the practices it draws on or resembles. Each row asks every practice the same question; each practice has a page with the detail and the sources.

How the therapies here compare with other kinds of therapy, and why that isn’t evidence about Circling

CirclingGestalt therapyFocusing
Connection to CirclingThe practice itself.An early influence, named in two practitioners’ histories of Circling. No Circling school’s own pages mention it.A resemblance: Circling’s histories don’t name it, though Deep Relating, an offshoot, says it grew from both.
SettingA practice, not a treatment; its schools say they don’t offer therapy.A therapy: someone works on themselves with a therapist, one to one, in a group or at a workshop.Different from CirclingA method in therapy, and a peer practice in pairs and walk-in groups.Partly the same
AimThe connection itself, with nothing to fix.Awareness of what you do and how you do it. In the founding book, the here and now is the method, not the goal.Partly the sameTo let an unclear bodily sense of a situation come into words that fit.Different from Circling
AttentionWhat is happening between people, moment by moment.The client’s experience as it happens, above all how they make and break contact, and the old patterns alive in it.Partly the sameInward, to one’s own felt sense.Different from Circling
How people speakOwning experience, staying with sensation, telling people how they affect you.In the present, saying “I”, to people rather than about them, down to what the body feels.Same as in CirclingWords come from the felt sense and are checked against it.Partly the same
The leaderTakes part, and says what they notice and feel.In Perls’s hot seat, works with one person while the group listens; in later, dialogic Gestalt, also shares their own experience.Partly the sameThe companion listens and reflects back what they hear.Different from Circling
EvidenceOne ethnography and two student theses; no controlled trial.Thin. Few studies test full Gestalt therapy on its own, and the main review of its family pools it with psychodrama.Deeper experiencing, which Focusing trains, goes with better therapy outcomes.
RisksNot yet studied.We found no study of harm in Gestalt groups as such. The best-known study of 1960s groups tied harm to a style of leading, not to a school.We found no study of harm.
To borrowNot applicable.Its rules for speaking, as a way to code what people say in recorded circles.The Experiencing Scale, an established measure of how deeply people work with their experience.